Writing Academic Task 2 Band 5.0 Example

There is a view among some individuals that well-experienced workers, such as engineers and doctors, should work in the country which they are trained. However, there is an opponent view of that they can be free to work wherever they want.On the one hand, when some professions get their education, they get subsidized tuition which is partly paid by the government, so some people think that graduates should repay this support by working in their home country. This may also help countries keep enough doctors and engineers, especially in places where public services already have a shortage. If many trained workers leave, patients may wait longer for treatment and important building projects can be delayed. For this reason, a period of service could be reasonable if the government has paid a large part of their education. However, this should be agreed before students begin their training and the job should have fair conditions.

On the other hand, these professionals have their own life and career plans. They may move because another country offers better salary, modern equipment or more chances to improve their skills. In some countries, doctors and engineers cannot find suitable jobs, so forcing them to remain may not be useful. Working abroad can also help them learn new methods, and they can later share this knowledge with colleagues at home. In addition, people should not be treated as property simply because public money helped pay for their studies.

In my opinion, professionals should generally be free to choose where they work. Governments can encourage them to stay by providing safe workplaces, good pay and opportunities for promotion. If students accept a clear scholarship agreement, they should follow its reasonable terms, but a general rule requiring everybody to remain is too strict. This approach respects personal freedom while recognising the public investment in education.