Writing Academic Task 2 Band 6.0 Example

It is sometimes argued that people who were educated in some schools, such as medical or engineering, in a certain country should not be allowed to leave the country. However, I am firmly of the opinion that professionals should have the right of choosing their region of interest to live in, even if they are trained in a different country. Those who support requiring professionals to remain point out that their education is often paid for, at least partly, by public money. If newly qualified doctors or engineers leave immediately, the country that trained them may lose important workers and struggle to provide essential services. This is especially concerning in places where there are already not enough medical staff. Requiring graduates to work locally for a limited period could therefore help communities and allow the government to benefit from its investment in education.

On the other hand, professionals should be able to decide where they live and work. They may have personal reasons for moving, such as joining family or seeking better career opportunities. They can also gain experience abroad and bring new skills to the country where they were trained if they return later. In addition, forcing people to stay could make them unhappy and less motivated in their work. A policy based on incentives, such as improved working conditions, may be more effective than a strict rule.

In my view, professionals should be free to work in another country, although governments can reasonably ask graduates who received substantial public support to contribute locally for a short, clearly defined period. This balances the needs of the community with individual freedom. Overall, supporting people to stay is preferable to preventing them from leaving.