Writing Academic Task 2 Band 7.0 Example

While certain individuals claim that zoos should be banned due to their harmful effects on animals, others believe that they are a perfect way to defend animals in danger. In my opinion, although zoos have some advantages such as protection of animals, they are still too dangerous for many creatures. On the one hand, these facilities can provide shelter and medical care for animals that have been injured or whose natural habitats have been destroyed. Some zoos also take part in breeding programmes for endangered species and may help researchers learn about their needs. In addition, visitors can see animals at close range, which may encourage greater interest in wildlife conservation. For species at immediate risk, a well-managed zoo could therefore offer a safe place to live and reproduce.

On the other hand, keeping wild animals in confined spaces can seriously affect their physical and mental wellbeing. Enclosures may not provide enough room or opportunities for animals to hunt, explore and socialise as they would in the wild. As a result, some animals develop stress-related behaviours. Moreover, not every zoo has the money or expertise to provide good conditions, so protection cannot be assumed simply because an animal is kept in captivity. Conservation efforts that preserve natural habitats may address the problem more effectively by allowing animals to remain in their ecosystems.

In conclusion, zoos can protect certain endangered animals and educate the public, but captivity can also cause significant harm. I believe they should not all be closed; instead, only facilities that meet high welfare and conservation standards should remain open, while resources should also be directed towards protecting wildlife in its natural environment.