Writing Academic Task 2 Band 9.0 Example

It is a contentious issue whether professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be mandated to work in the country where they completed their education and training, or whether they should be granted the freedom to work in another country if they so desire. Both perspectives have valid arguments, but in my opinion, the benefits of allowing these workers to choose where they live and work outweigh those of requiring them to remain in their country of training.

Supporters of compulsory service argue that governments often subsidise professional education, particularly in fields such as medicine. It may therefore seem fair for graduates to contribute to the society that funded their training. This policy could also help address shortages in essential services, especially in rural areas where recruiting doctors can be difficult. If a country invests public money in developing skilled professionals, ensuring that some of their expertise benefits its residents is a reasonable concern.

However, requiring people to work in one country restricts their freedom and may be difficult to enforce fairly. Professionals may have compelling reasons to move, including family responsibilities, better career opportunities or a lack of suitable positions at home. Moreover, the possibility of working abroad can attract talented people into demanding fields in the first place. Countries facing staff shortages can respond through better pay, improved working conditions and targeted recruitment, rather than limiting graduates’ choices. Agreements requiring a period of service may be appropriate when students receive substantial, clearly explained financial support, but they should be proportionate and time-limited.

Overall, although countries have a legitimate interest in retaining some of the expertise they help finance, professionals should generally be free to choose where they work. Incentives and fair, transparent service agreements are preferable to a blanket requirement, since they can support local communities without unnecessarily restricting individual choice.