Writing Academic Task 2 Band 9.0 Example

The inclusion of non-academic subjects in the school curriculum has always been a heated topic. Some people believe these subjects should be part of the educational system, while others disagree. From my point of view, I completely oppose the idea of removing these subjects from the curriculum. The educational structure places immense pressure on students, and this can make academic achievement appear to be the only measure of a child's potential. However, removing non-academic subjects would not solve this problem; it would deprive pupils of skills that are essential both inside and outside the classroom.

Physical education, for example, encourages children to remain active and teaches them to cooperate, follow rules and persevere when a task is difficult. These qualities can support learning in academic subjects rather than compete with it. Cookery is equally valuable. By learning to prepare simple, balanced meals, pupils can develop independence and make more informed choices about their health. Lessons can also apply classroom knowledge in practical contexts: measuring ingredients uses mathematics, while following a recipe requires careful reading and sequencing.

Admittedly, school time is limited, and young people may already face considerable academic demands. It is therefore reasonable to ensure that non-academic lessons do not crowd out core subjects or create unnecessary pressure. Yet this is an argument for a balanced timetable and thoughtful teaching, not for removing these subjects altogether. Schools can keep these lessons focused and integrate relevant skills with other areas of learning.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose removing physical education, cookery and similar subjects from the syllabus. Academic achievement matters, but education should also prepare children to lead healthy, capable and balanced lives.