User-written IELTS example

Writing Academic Task 2 Band 4.0 Example

Original task prompt, user essay, band score, and related examples in the same report workspace.

300 words AcademicTask 2

Task 2

Illustrative target band for this original model answer.

Plan your answer

Try your own response before reading the samples.

Ideas to explore

Physical education can support students’ health and give them a way to manage the stress of academic demands.
Cookery teaches practical independence and helps students make informed choices about food.
Limited school time supports careful curriculum planning, but does not necessarily justify removing non-academic subjects altogether.

Suggested structure

Introduce the pressure to succeed academically and state clearly whether you agree with removing non-academic subjects.
Explain one benefit of physical education and connect it to students’ wellbeing or development.
Explain one practical benefit of cookery and why it matters beyond the classroom.
Acknowledge limited teaching time and propose balancing subjects instead of eliminating them.
Restate your position and briefly summarise why a broad curriculum is valuable.

Useful vocabulary & examples

a balanced curriculum: A programme of study that includes different kinds of subjects rather than focusing on only one area.
A balanced curriculum can give students time to develop academic knowledge and practical skills.
manage academic stress: Deal with pressure arising from schoolwork or academic expectations.
Physical activity may help young people manage academic stress.
practical skills: Useful abilities that can be applied to everyday tasks and responsibilities.
Cookery lessons help pupils develop practical skills they can use at home.
allocate teaching time: Decide how available classroom time is divided among subjects or activities.
Schools can allocate teaching time carefully without removing non-academic subjects.

Task Prompt

There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

User Essay Analysis

Review the public answer with report-style highlights.

Band 4.0

It has been widely known that more and more youngsters, in the present day, are thriving for the success in terms of their careers or academically, however, some teachers assert that some mandatory school subjects better be taken, especially the ones specialized for cookery and physical education. I fundamentally align with the given viewpoint inasmuch as I think these subjects should be removed from the school syllabus, so students can spend more time on academic work. Firstly, young people have many subjects to study and some of them have important exams. If they also have to attend cookery and physical education lessons, they may become tired and have less time to study subjects like maths and science. This can make them not achieve their goals in the future. Therefore, school should give more lessons to academic subjects which help students to enter university or find a good career.

Moreover, not every student enjoy these non-academic subjects. Some children are not good at sport, while others do not like cooking. Making all students study these subjects can make them feel bored and lose interest in school. They should have a choice to use their free time for the subjects that they are more interested in. This may help them to study better and get good results.

On the other hand, cookery and physical education are useful for normal life. People need to know how to prepare food and exercise is important for health. However, these things can be learnt at home or in optional activities after school. They do not need to be compulsory subjects for every student.

In conclusion, I agree that cookery and physical education should be removed as required subjects. Academic study is more important for students future, and children can learn these practical skills in other ways.

Targeted Improvement Tips

State your position in a direct sentence, then use the same position consistently: for example, argue that the subjects should not be compulsory, rather than implying that they have no value.

Develop each reason with a clear chain: claim, explanation, and a relevant example. For instance, explain how an extra lesson affects study time instead of jumping directly to future outcomes.

After drafting, check subject–verb agreement, possessive apostrophes, and sentence boundaries; pay particular attention to “every student,” “students’ futures,” and the opening sentence.

AI Feedback

Overall Band

4.0

Modest

Words

300

Type

Task 2

Criteria Breakdown

Task Response

4.5 Band

The position is clear in “I fundamentally align with the given viewpoint,” and the answer gives reasons about study time, student preferences, and practical skills. It also briefly recognises the value of cookery and exercise. However, the reasons are mostly asserted rather than developed, and the conclusion’s claim that academic study is “more important” is not fully justified. Next, explain one example in depth and qualify your agreement.

Coherence & Cohesion

4.5 Band

The response has a recognisable progression: academic workload, student preferences, a counterargument, and a conclusion. Paragraphs and signposts such as “Moreover” and “On the other hand” help the reader follow it. Some links between claims are abrupt, particularly from tiring lessons to future goals, and ideas about choice repeat. Next, develop each paragraph around one main reason and add a clear explanation connecting that reason to your position.

Lexical Resource

4.0 Band

The answer uses relevant topic vocabulary, including “school syllabus,” “compulsory subjects,” “academic subjects,” and “optional activities.” However, several word combinations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “thriving for the success” and “subjects better be taken,” and repeated words like “subjects” limit variety. Next, learn accurate collocations for agreement and school requirements, then check each phrase for natural word pairing.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

4.0 Band

Simple sentence patterns communicate the main position, and the essay attempts longer clauses with “while” and “which.” However, errors recur, including the opening comma splice, “not every student enjoy,” and “students future.” These reduce clarity and control. Next, practise subject–verb agreement and possessives, and divide the opening sentence into two to avoid joining complete clauses with only a comma.

Topic Band Distribution

Band 9.03 examples

Band 8.03 examples

Band 7.03 examples

Band 6.03 examples

Band 5.03 examples

Band 4.03 examples

Practice this prompt

Use the same topic in Hack Admission AI and compare your answer with this example.

Check your answer on this topic Browse all examples