Writing Academic Task 2 Band 6.0 Example

It is widely said that there is burden of being successful for youngsters, giving rise to the notion that students should not spend their school time attending non-academic subjects such as physical education and cookery due to the need for concentration on academic. In my opinion, although I acknowledge a benefit of taking on the extra time for academic study, I disagree with removing these subjects from the school syllabus. They help children develop in ways that academic lessons alone may not provide.

Firstly, physical education is important for both physical and mental health. Many young people spend long hours sitting in classrooms or studying at home, so regular exercise at school gives them an opportunity to be active. It can also reduce stress and help students return to their academic work with better concentration. Therefore, removing PE could make it harder, rather than easier, for some pupils to learn effectively.

Secondly, cookery teaches practical skills that students can use throughout their lives. Children who learn to prepare simple meals may become more independent and understand the value of healthy food. These lessons can also develop planning and responsibility. Such abilities are useful even if they do not directly improve examination results.

Of course, schools have limited time, and academic subjects are essential for future study and employment. However, this does not mean that non-academic classes must be removed. Schools could organise the timetable carefully, for example by offering these subjects for fewer hours while ensuring that students still receive regular lessons in them. In conclusion, academic success is important, but I believe that physical education and cookery should remain part of the syllabus because they support students' health and everyday development.